

Consequently, the sensor was warmed up, and there was lots of color noise and plenty of hot pixels too. Prior to taking this photo, I have been shooting long exposures for over an hour. It was an 1,800-second exposure taken at night at the end of an extended long-exposure photoshoot using an Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, which has since had two generational replacements.
#Lightroom classic 10.3 software#
It was one I shot for the sole purpose of testing noise reduction software over four years ago, long before I started writing for Fstoppers. So, I found the noisiest photo I had in my catalog. I was eager to push the software further.

Pushing the Noise Reduction to Its Limits I reiterate that none of the AI programs produced bad results. The differences in these results are seen at 100% and are minor. This is, of course, a subjective point of view. It left a very slight and not unpleasant graininess that I preferred to the overly smooth results of Lightroom's denoise tool. Topaz DeNoise used as a plugin for Lightroom. Nevertheless, it will be a welcome addition for those who use Lightroom, especially if they use older cameras and shoot moving subjects in low light. The advancements in sensor technology mean noise reduction is becoming redundant for photographers.Īdobe should have introduced this feature three years ago. Modern cameras perform better than I ever need, and I suspect that is true for many others too. Furthermore, with my newest camera, I can shoot long exposures without having noisy images.
#Lightroom classic 10.3 iso#
I can use my OM-1 at ISO 6,400 or even 12,800 without thinking of applying noise reduction.Įven increasing shadows by two stops, noise is not an issue for me. I swapped to mirrorless Micro Four Thirds, and that doubled again to ISO 1,600, and then to ISO 3,200. My first DSLR I could use up to ISO 400 without the photos becoming too noisy to use. Please excuse the mixing of metaphors, but Adobe’s horse is not only escaping from the stable, but people stopped watching the race it should have been running in. The noise control was pretty good straight out of the camera. Closing the Stable Door After the Horse Has Bolted?Įven in the low light in the shelter of trees and underexposing by -2 EV to darken the background, putting the ISO up to 1,600 gave me 1/16,000th of a second, far faster than I needed to capture this image. Moreover, it will still be a popular plugin with Capture One owners even if it becomes redundant for Lightroom users Capture One does not currently have AI-based noise reduction. Meanwhile, Topaz Denoise, which is not an integral part of an asset management and raw development suite, is not the only tool in that company’s arsenal. The other standalone programs, like DxO Photolab 6, ON1 Photo Raw, and Capture One, are considered with high regard by their users, as they produce very different development results that many of their users prefer. However, there’s more to processing than noise reduction. Given that many people use these AI-based programs as plugins for Lightoom and Photoshop, there is concern that Adobe is creating a monopoly, as these third-party plugins will become redundant. I’ve just tested Lightroom’s new AI-driven noise reduction alongside other programs to see how well that would do compared to the other tools. Some are slightly better than others, but those differences were more to do with speed and usability than noise reduction performance. In the past, I’ve run numerous tests, running the same raw files through each, and every one of them does a more than adequate job. Even camera brands’ proprietary software provides its own AI noise reduction OM Workspace, growing in popularity with OM System users, has AI noise reduction built in.Īll those programs work well. In the case of DXO PhotoLab 6 and ON1 Photo Raw, they have also integrated AI noise reduction into their own asset management and raw development software. Those applications worked well as plugins for Lightroom and Photoshop.

There is already an array of AI-based noise reduction programs Topaz DeNoise AI, ON1 NoNoise AI, and DxO Deep Prime all performed much better than Adobe's appallingly bad muddy noise reduction results.
